1968 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 654 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DKW Munga | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1764 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 78 L |
