1968 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 513 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 805 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DKW Munga | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | DKW | Cadillac |
| Model | Munga | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
