1968 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Bravo (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 325 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DKW Munga | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | Munga | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 58 L |
