1968 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (325 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 811 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DKW Munga | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | XC60 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |