1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 785 kg more than 1968 Dodge Coronet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Coronet | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Coronet | Econoline |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3510 mm |