1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 3,690 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Dodge Coronet (143 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Dodge Coronet should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1968 Dodge Coronet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Coronet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Dodge Coronet | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Coronet | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3690 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2490 mm |
