1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Coronet weights approximately 265 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3.
Because 1968 Dodge Coronet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Coronet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Dodge Coronet | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Coronet | 3 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6974 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2650 mm |
