1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Coronet weights approximately 670 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Dodge Coronet | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Coronet | Smart |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2370 mm |
