1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2003 Toyota Tundra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 180 kg more than 1968 Dodge Coronet.
Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Dodge Coronet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Coronet | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Coronet | Tundra |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3270 mm |