1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Coronet weights approximately 796 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Coronet | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Coronet | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 1810 mm |