1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Dodge Coronet (230 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Dodge Coronet should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Coronet weights approximately 260 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Dodge Coronet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Coronet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Dodge Coronet (461 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Dodge Coronet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Coronet | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Coronet | 75 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |