1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Coronet weights approximately 2 kg more than 2010 Nissan Rogue.
Because 1968 Dodge Coronet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Coronet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Dodge Coronet | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Coronet | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1659 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2690 mm |
