1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 335 kg more than 1968 Dodge Coronet.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Dodge Coronet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Coronet | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Coronet | XF |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2909 mm |