1968 Dodge Dart vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Dart would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Dart weights approximately 442 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1968 Dodge Dart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Dart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Dart | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Dart | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |