1968 Dodge Polara vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Dodge Polara (230 HP) has 109 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 207. (121 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 207.
Because 1968 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1968 Dodge Polara has automatic transmission and 2010 Peugeot 207 has manual transmission. 2010 Peugeot 207 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Dodge Polara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Dodge Polara | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Dodge | Peugeot |
| Model | Polara | 207 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 121 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
