1968 Dodge Polara vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (302 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1968 Dodge Polara. (230 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1968 Dodge Polara.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Dodge Polara (461 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML. (370 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Dodge Polara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Polara | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Polara | ML |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 93 L |