1968 Fiat 850 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Fiat 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Fiat 850 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1968 Fiat 850. (51 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Fiat 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1124 kg more than 1968 Fiat 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Fiat 850. (65 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Fiat 850.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Fiat 850 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | 850 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 383 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 715 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 87 L |