1968 Fiat 850 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Fiat 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Fiat 850 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1968 Fiat 850. (51 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1968 Fiat 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1102 kg more than 1968 Fiat 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Fiat 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Fiat 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Fiat 850. (65 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Fiat 850. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1968 Fiat 850 has manual transmission. 1968 Fiat 850 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Fiat 850 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | 850 | XTS |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 715 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 72 L |