1968 Ford 12 M vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1968 Ford 12 M is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1968 Ford 12 M. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 134 kg more than 1968 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Zastava 1500 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1964 Zastava 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 12 M | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | 12 M | 1500 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 1182 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2430 mm |