1968 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Holden UTE

To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1968 Ford 12 M. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 650 kg more than 1968 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 12 M.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford 12 M 2004 Holden UTE
Make Ford Holden
Model 12 M UTE
Year Released 1968 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1182 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 44 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 305 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 850 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2950 mm