1968 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1968 Ford 12 M. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 12 M.
Because 1968 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 12 M | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1182 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |