1968 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1968 Ford 12 M. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 12 M.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 12 M | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1182 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |