1968 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1968 Ford 12 M. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 12 M.
Because 1968 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 12 M | 2012 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | 12 M | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1182 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 61 L |