1968 Ford 17 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1968 Ford 17 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,550 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford 17 (123 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford 17 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford 17 (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford 17 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | 17 | FX |
Year Released | 1968 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2550 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 201 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |