1968 Ford 17 vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 Ford 17 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,550 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford 17 (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford 17 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford 17 (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1968 Ford 17 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 17 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2550 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |