1968 Ford 17 vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1968 Ford 17 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1286 kg more than 1968 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford 17 | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | 17 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |
