1968 Ford 17 vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | 17 | Murena |
Year Released | 1968 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70.9 mm | 81.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2440 mm |