1968 Ford 17 vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1983 Jeep CJ is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,550 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford 17 (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford 17 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 150 kg more than 1968 Ford 17.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford 17. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford 17 (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1968 Ford 17 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | 17 | CJ |
Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2550 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |