1968 Ford 17 vs. 1987 Peugeot 405
To start off, 1987 Peugeot 405 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Peugeot 405 (92 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Peugeot 405 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Peugeot 405 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Peugeot 405, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Peugeot 405 (196 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1987 Peugeot 405 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 1987 Peugeot 405 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | 17 | 405 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 92 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |