1968 Ford 17 vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 1994 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (81 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1994 Nissan Pulsar.

Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (132 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford 17 1994 Nissan Pulsar
Make Ford Nissan
Model 17 Pulsar
Year Released 1968 1994
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1812 cc 1594 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 81 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 132 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4150 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2440 mm