1968 Ford 17 vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 2000 Honda FCX | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 17 | FCX |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 273 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |