1968 Ford 17 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 849 kg more than 1968 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford 17. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (112 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford 17 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 17 | SSU |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |
