1968 Ford 17 vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
Make | Ford | Pininfarina |
Model | 17 | Metrocubo |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 505 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |