1968 Ford 17 vs. 2001 Toyota HMV
To start off, 2001 Toyota HMV is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,399 cc, 2001 Toyota HMV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota HMV (202 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota HMV should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota HMV weights approximately 561 kg more than 1968 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota HMV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota HMV (280 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (185 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota HMV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 2001 Toyota HMV | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 17 | HMV |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2293 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1681 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 60 L |