1968 Ford 17 vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 387 kg more than 1968 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (262 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (148 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 17 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 262 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 62 L |