1968 Ford 17 vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,550 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford 17. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 17 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2550 cc | 2262 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 62 L |