1968 Ford 17 vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 17 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 15 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |