1968 Ford 17 vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford 17 2010 Suzuki Equator
Make Ford Suzuki
Model 17 Equator
Year Released 1968 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 3954 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 85 HP 262 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 148 Nm 381 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 5600 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 3560 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 80 L