1968 Ford 17 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (81 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (132 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 2011 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | 17 | Compass |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 51 L |