1968 Ford Corsair vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1968 Ford Corsair. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 915 kg more than 1968 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford Corsair. (101 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Corsair | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Corsair | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 78 L |