1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1944 Simca 5
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Simca 5 would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1944 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1944 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 1021 kg more than 1944 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1944 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Fairlane | 5 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1944 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 564 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2010 mm |
