1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 340 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Fairlane | FX |
Year Released | 1968 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |