1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1950 Triumph Roadster
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Roadster would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1950 Triumph Roadster. (71 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1950 Triumph Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 237 kg more than 1950 Triumph Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1950 Triumph Roadster | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Fairlane | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1163 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 54 L |
