1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1951 Peugeot 203
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1951 Peugeot 203. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1951 Peugeot 203. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 390 kg more than 1951 Peugeot 203. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1951 Peugeot 203 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Fairlane | 203 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 44 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |
