1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1955 Saab 92
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Saab 92 would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 615 kg more than 1955 Saab 92.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1955 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Fairlane | 92 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2480 mm |
