1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 110 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Ford | Studebaker |
| Model | Fairlane | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 5768 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2980 mm |
