1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1960 Holden FC
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 420 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1960 Holden FC | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Fairlane | FC |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2670 mm |
