1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1962 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 210 kg more than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1962 Simca Plein Ceil | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Fairlane | Plein Ceil |
Year Released | 1968 | 1962 |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 42 L |