1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 176 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Fairlane | EJ |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2680 mm |
