1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 520 kg more than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Fairlane | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 40 L |
